Women’s work

For the coming full moon, CAYA’s Grove of Artemis is focusing on the archetype of the weaver/dreamer. Obviously, this is a ritual I’m very excited about, and its gotten me thinking a lot about the work that women do in this world.

Women’s work.

What comes to mind when you hear that phrase? How do you feel about it? Do you conjure up sepia-toned images of quiling bees or the soft whiring of a spinning wheel? Or the quintessential 1950s mother cheerfully cooking dinner for her family and cleaning the house, all in heels and pearls? How about a corporate executive, with her powersuit and iPhone?

Women’s work. What is it? What does it mean?

Sifting through history you find–pardon the pun–common threads. Women create. Now, this may seem strange at first, since a glance at any art history textbook will tell you that most artists were men. But that’s just where things start to get interesting. Male artists? Are a very small percentage of the population. Most men are not artists, and most artists never move from obscurity to claim a place in the canon of western art.  Women on the other hand, well, a look through history will tell you that nearly every woman was a creator. From the poorest peasant woman spinning and stitching to keep her family warm to the most powerful noblewoman whose delicate stitchwork offered proof of of her status.

Collectively, women took the most basic needs of clothing and warmth and they turned them into things of beauty. Simple socks became stockings with intricately stitched patterns. Woven cloths used to insulate the walls and floors became storied tapestries and brilliantly patterned carpets. Blankets became quilts that told history, life events, or even led the way to freedom.  Women learned these crafts and though for centuries they were denied access to education, they taught these skills to their daughters who learned a rich history that still gets overlooked and undervalued.

Craft. A word that is scorned, marked, dropped out of “arts and crafts” until art–as decided by the mainly male, mainly white establishment–is all that’s left worthy of respect. But without craft, what do you have left? Women craft the things needed for survival, and in doing so, they craft the culture that endures through time. Women weave at their looms, and they weave together the stories and history that really matter. Not the history of conquerers and kings, but of our ordinary ancestors. Women gather for quilting bees or stitch n’ bitch nights, and who bring the community together.

I worry sometimes that this history is being lost. I am a feminist, and I am also a career woman. But sometimes I think that we’ve thrown the baby out with the bathwater; now knitting or sewing or quilting is seen as hopelessy uncool in most circles (despite much trumpeting of the trendiness of craft). Even in the midst of a massive movement to rethink the way America eats, canning and gardening are viewed as hopelessly quaint, or as occassional hobbies not a way of life. We’ve lost touch with the very things that we need to do to sustain life. If we’re cold, we buy a sweater or turn up the heat, if we’re hungry, we stop at macdonalds. If our skirt tears, we toss it in the trash rather than try to mend it.

It’s time, I think, that we start taking a hard look at the value of women’s work. There is value to it, and as the economy and gluttenous society we’ve built up begins to crack and crumble, it only becomes more useful.

As a witch, I turn the wheel of the year with the seasons. As a woman, I create and stitch the same way that women have done through the ages. And together, as witches and women, I believe we can craft a future where we live in a closer relationship with the earth, and we can begin to value the work women have traditionally done and move towards a less disposable and more sustainable world.

  • http://fabulouspants.blogspot.com Amy

    Wow! You really were able to put into words what I was trying to say and thinking about on Saturday. Thanks so much for letting me complain about the things that were bugging me and melting in the heat with me. Also, thank you for posting this. It means a lot to me to have others ponder these same things. *hugs* I cannot wait for more women’s work with you in public that people can choose to photograph like some animal in the zoo! ;)

  • http://dreamsfromthewestwind.blogspot.com/ thora

    well, it probably says something about how i grew up, but when i hear “women’s work”, i think of doing laundry in a tub on the back porch, or slopping the pigs, not needlework. i don’t see the 50′s or the pearls, i see my grandmother shucking corn in august saying “a woman’s work is never done”. yes, women were responsible for a large majority of material culture (though remember, men did a lot of it too, especially things like woodcraft and home building and metal working, and that sort of thing), but aside from embroidery and knitting, most people, women included, worked dawn till dusk at brutal heavy labor every day of their lives.
    also something we forget in the modern era is that hobbies were seasonal- you wouldn’t knit or embroider in the summer, there were too many more valuable things you could be doing with the long hours of light. arts and crafts were winter things, when you could only go outside to feed the stock and turn the meat in the smokehouse, then come back in and work by the fire.

    • sgwhites

      A lot of good points here–part of why I didn’t address those aspects as much are a) I think of things like caring for animals, farms, etc. as not strictly women’s work because they would generally be shared by all members of the family. Not that women didn’t contribute, but men and children would also be responsible for many of these tasks. As for woodworking and metal work, I agree that these are great crafts and part of culture, but it often seems that by virtue of being (predominantly) done by men, they entered a canon of “respectable” art, whereas knitting, embroidery, etc. haven’t. Architecture, sculpture, furniture and other wood working are all pretty highly regarded, and it’s easy to think of sort of “superstars” in at least the two former categories. But how many quilters can you name? Or, I think of examples like a friend of mine who makes art quilts. He’s incredibly talented, but he’s really not doing anything that new or groundbreaking in terms of quilting, yet his stuff took off like gangbusters on the blogosphere a while back. I love his work and I’m thrilled for him, but there were a lot of women doing the same kind of quilting with no recognition. Was it a case of right time and right place? Perhaps. But I wonder if he would have gotten so much attention if he were female.

  • Brenda

    Nicely said… just thought I might point you towards this book: http://www.amazon.com/Womens-Work-First-Years-Society/dp/0393313484/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1251746676&sr=1-1
    It’s really good… and, I think you’d enjoy it.

  • http://www.suekearney.com/morninggratitudes raven

    Right on! Crone’s wisdom from the mouth of a chronological maiden. Music to my fabric-loving, yarn-loving, woman’s work–honoring ears. What she said…

  • http://blissfullyeccentric.blogspot.com Alex

    I was going to point you to:

    Barber, E. W., Women’s Work: The First 20,000 Years, (New York, London: W.W. Norton and Company, 1994).

    But Brenda got their first.

    I’m from a different faith tradition to you, but all this is something I read in depth about for my dissertation. You can read the diss, and the bibliography here:

    http://blissfullyeccentric.blogspot.com/2008/07/unraveling-threads.html

    I think the creative force comes from our primal creative force, that of the mother. And it pleases me greatly to be a daughter of God our Mother!