Sock Kit: Black Cat

One of the big knitterly trends I haven’t jumped on is the sock club or kit. It’s not that I haven’t wanted to, but I have a hard time justifying the up front cost of most clubs or kits, and I also have been telling myself it’s not like I need to have yarn delivered to me once a month when I can’t keep up with all the stash I do have.

But then I saw the Woolgirl Sock Kits.

And maybe I fell down and accidentally orered a couple.

Of course, I completely forgot I’d ordered these until the invoices came, at which point I paid them and completely forgot about them again until a package arrived on Friday!

Black Cat Kit

It was my Black Cat Sock Club!

The Kit Unwrapped

Isn’t it adorable? There were so many cute goodies–yarn, a great pattern, a project bag, a notepad, charm, ornament, stitch marker, candy in a cute vintage box, tissue holder and tissues, all with black cats! It’s very exciting; it’s very hard to find black cat stuff except at Halloween. As the owner of a witchy black cat, I find that very sad. But this kit is so adorable. I can’t wait to start using all my goodies.

Feeling 16 Again

I’ve had the week off this week, and have been taking my vacation at home. (I refuse to call it a staycation. I just refuse.)

The main part of this has been spent sleeping, cleaning, and studying. Yes, studying. I’m planning on taking the GRE next month, and my math knowledge is woefully deficient. Granted, it’s been about 10 years–or more–since I’ve had some of this math so I’m not really surprised. Some of it I’ve just forgotten because I don’t go around routinely calculating angles or the area of a cube. Some I don’t think I ever learned properly in the first place. But some of it isn’t so bad–any word problems based on grocery shopping are a breeze! Far easier than I remember them being in high school, but then, I shop for my own food on a budget now so I guess I’m used to thinking about cost.

In addition to the studying, I’ve been rewatching Buffy the Vampire Slayer. I’m impressed by how well the show holds up–but there is one side effect. As I’m sitting there doing math problems with Buffy on (bad study habits, I know) I can’t help feeling like I’m 16 again! I want to call up my friends and be silly or have a slumber party…

Of course, I can’t do that. Even if people weren’t so busy, there’s not enough room to have all my friends over so then you get into that weird minefield where I worry about somebody getting offended if other people are over, even when the only reason is floor space. Plus, you know, we’re all busy. It sucks sometimes. I genrally am a fan of the whole being an adult thing, but sometime I do kind of want to be able to call up my friends have them come over and hang out and watch stupid movies and, I don’t know, do each other’s hair and whatever.

Not that I did much of that in high school, because that was around the time that my group of friends split apart so I didn’t really have more than one or two friends, and a good deal of the people I hung out with had a habit of ditching me for whatever better offer came along.

At any rate, it’s a very weird mental place to be in. But if it cons my brain into relearning algebra and geometry then I am all for it! Plus, the other day? I totally factored something. CORRECTLY. I don’t think I’ve ever done that.

Today, I have to do some quick cleaning and then the parade of people begins. Somehow I have managed to have plans with three different people today–plans include finished object photos, chatting about alchemy, and watching the premeire of Fringe. So I should have new knitting to show off here soon!

Excessively Girly Socks

After lurking in the Sock Knitters Anonymous group on Ravelry for some time, I’ve finally decided to jump in to the sock down challenge! I cast on for September’s challenge with Kirsten Kapur’s Rhodie Gus pattern. I’m using Knitpick’s Imagination yarn in Damsel.

I have to tell you. These are the girliest socks EVAR.

photo.jpg

I’m calling them my Pretty Pretty Princess socks, becasue they would make 8 year old me over the moon happy with pink and purple fuzzy goodness.

Actually, they’re making 27 year old me pretty darn happy too.

Besides, who couldn’t use some excessively girly socks?

Fall TV Roundup

So, it’s September and you know what that means? New TV!

Geek alert: Normally this is one of my favorite times of year. I love getting a chance to see new shows and settle in with my favorite characters. But this year?

I’m feeling seriously underwhelmed. I’ve joked in the past about collecting DVDs and putting together my perfect TV lineup, but it seems that reality is coming closer. Or, hey–if the apocalypse comes, I’ll have enough to put together a line-up for about 9 seasons.  Hook up some sort of alternative power source, and I’ve got your entertainment right here, folks.

Okay, that’s probably not the best survivavlist skill to have to offer in the event of the breakdown of civilizatin. But, um, I also make socks?

Anyway, none of that is the point. The point is the fall TV lineup. Now, I know I tend to hold onto things–there are still gaping Buffy and X-Files shaped holes in my entertainment life–but I’m really not enthused. An embarrassing amount of what I’m looking forward to consists mainly of an excuse to stare at pretty actors. (What? I can’t be shallow sometimes?)

So, here’s my take:

Returning Series

  • How I Met Your Mother: I watch this one on and off.  It’s been hit or miss for me, but Neil Patrick Harris is hilarious and on par it’s usually pretty good. Even if it kind of makes me hate my age group sometimes, but so does society at large.
  • Castle: I’m not blown away by the writing on this, but there’s one solid reason to watch this show–Nathan Fillion. The rest of the cast isn’t bad either, and there are usually at least a few great moments. Plus, did I mention Nathan Fillion?
  • NCIS: I used to be a big fan, so I really hate to say it but I think this show has run out of steam. I gave up partway through last year–I want to love it, but I’m just not as engaged. Maybe it’s me?
  • Law & Order: SVU: I usually catch this on reruns but I admit it, I’m a junkie. Yes, it’s depressing and yes, most of the episodes are re-hashes of old ones or straight out of the news but come on. Mariska Hargitay is kicking ass. If only they’d bring back Cabot.
  • Criminal Minds: Okay, the writing on this one has been slipping a little. The first few seasons were straight out of John Douglas’ books, but at least somewhat realistic. They’ve sinced strayed into the incredibly unrealistic serial killer realm (Hint: most of them aren’t that bright) but the characters keep me coming back. Well, that and Shemar Moore’s biceps. Though I’m seriously bummed to hear of A.J. Cook’s departure and the reduced role for Paget Brewster, which leaves the absolutely stunning Kirsten Vangsness as the main female lead. They better not cut her screen time–Garcia is hands down my favorite character.
  • Bones: I love this show because I pretend it’s a total coincidence that the Brennan shares a name with the lead in Kathy Reichs’ books. Again, ignore the science. This show is all about the characters, and the fantastic chemistry between Emily Deschanel and David Boreanaz.
  • The Big Bang Theory: A show that laughs with geeks instead of at them. I am so there. Also, Wil Wheaton and Katee Sackhoff are both returning a guest stars!
  • Fringe: Probably the show I’m most excited about. John Noble is pitch-perfect as brilliant yet crazy Walter Bishop, who traverses between guilt-ridden father and a scientists whose brilliance overshadows his better ethics. Plus, the cliff hanger has left me on the edge, wondering how the dynamic between Olivia and Fauxlivia, Walter and Walternate will play out. And how will Peter continue to deal with the revelations of his past? (Plus, I’m apparently hosting a Fringe watching party at my place. I should clean.)
  • CSI: Okay, I gave up on this when Jorja Fox left and they tried to convince us that Sara Sidle married Grissom even when she very  clearly had much more chemistry with Louise Lombard’s Sofia. But the news that Katee Sackhoff is joining the cast for at least a few episodes has me coming back because yes, internet, I AM THAT PREDICTABLE. Put Jorja Fox and Katee Sackhoff on the same screen and I will overlook just about anything else.

New Shows

  • Lone Star: This one’s a maybe. The story of two con men, plus some family issues has potential. But I’m a little worried it’s going to fall into the trend of over the top stereotypes that’s been everywhere lately. (See: Desperate Housewives, Glee.) I know a lot of people are enjoying that style, but I’m no one of them. We’ll see.
  • The Event: Mysterious events. Unanswered questions. Laura Innes. Could this fill the void left by Lost? I hope so.
  • Mike & Molly: I’m surprised that I’ve found myself excited by this one, not being a comedy kind of girl for the most part. But I loved Melissa McCarthy in Gilmore Girls, and I’m pleasantly surprised to see a show that features two leads who don’t fit Hollywood’s typical body standards. I’m just hoping they have us laughing with them, instead of at them.
  • Blue Bloods: Okay, I’m a sucker for a good cop show. Give me a show that calls up images of truth, justice, and service and I get all warm and fuzzy. I know, I know. Toss in some family drama and I’ve got high hopes.
  • The Walking Dead: I’ve been informed that I should tune into this, and so I shall at least give it a shot. Besides, it’s got apocalyptic settings and zombies. What more could a girl want?

I’m not sure how many of these I’ll keep tuning into, or what will drop off my DVR. What are you watching this fall? Anything I’ve missed that I should be watching?

Calendar Update: Miss October

I know it’s been a while since there’s been a calendar update–our funding on Kickstarter has closed and we met our goal! Hooray! I celebrated by dancing around happily, then caught up on all the sleep I’d missed fretting about it.

But–there are still photos to share! Right now my time is taken up by finishing up the photo shoots and beginning to sort out the layout. Once that’s done, we’re off to the printers! We’ll also be putting calendars up on Etsy or similar venues, if you weren’t able to get one via Kickstarter, so I’ll make sure to let you know when those are up, too.

One of the photo shoots I haven’t had a chance to talk about Miss October! Isn’t she delightfully wicked? Brenda is a knitter and spinner, and I loved getting a chance to see this sexy and spooky shoot take shape.

Sad Knitter Is Sad

You know that sweater I showed you yesterday?

Here, let me remind you:

Frontier Lady Cardigan WIP

Yeah. That one. The one where I was chugging away on the raglan increases?

At some point last night I looked at the sweater, looked at how many increases I had left, and realized there was no way my gauge was accurate enough.

In an attempt to be a Responsible Kniter, I did not fling the project against the wall and sulk as I might have liked. Instead, I began yanking it out, and did some tricky math to figure out how to make it work.

Although now that I think about it, I might consider getting the correct size needles and trying to swatch again.

Well played, sweater. Well played.

An Age With No Myth

I just finished watching Troy. While I know that it’s important not to fall prey to the temptation to romanticize the past which was  for most nasty, brutish, and short, there’s something about old myths and stories that gives me pause.

I read old myths or hear old legends and I think: we are still telling these stories. We still know these names. Achilles. Hector. Odysseus. Boudica. Arthur. Lancelot. Caesar. Cleopatra.

Looking around, I think. What are our epics? Corporate takeovers? Court decisions? Blockbusters? Apathy?

What stories will they tell about us? Will anyone be worth remembering?

Email Outreach for Unplugged Organizations

Or, how not to lose potential members.

In the past few months, I’ve had the occasion to attend a few festivals. I love a good festival (especially when it involves men in kilts) and being the chronic volunteer that I am, I tend to sign up for things I’m interested in. If you have more than about two booths, it’s unlikely that I’m going to remember much, if anything, about something even if I’m completely enthralled at the time. (Actually, this may hold true even if you only have two booths; I can be a bit flighty, especially when I’m distracted by shiny objects.)

It makes me super happy, then to get to sign up on a list and receive information I can look at later. It’s especially good if there may be membership fees involved–not only does it give me a chance to realistically examine my budget, it saves me having to try and disguise the “you charge HOW much?” face that sometimes occurs.

Problem is? Sometimes, people have no idea what to do with these lists once they have them. I had three different experiences lately that seemd to provide good examples of bad, decent, and best ways to reach out to collected lists and thought I’d share. (Names have been removed to protect the  groups involved.)

The first example is the best. I went to a festival, chatted with the folks and signed up to get more information, as they had run out of membership forms. Fair enough, and I actually prefer email anyway. They warned me that it might take a couple of days, as they were pretty busy. About a week and a half later, I get a short email from the guy I talked to. It’s short, to the point, and includes a link to their website and lets us know we can contact him directly with any questions. All the recipients have been BCC’d.

This is perfect. It reminded me that I’d signed up, allowed me to check out more of what their doing, and I feel like they’re sincerely interested in answering my questions. (Even if that’s not the case, it at least appears to be.) I’m going to be emailing them for an application very soon.

Then there’s the second organization. This is from a festival back in June. They don’t have an email list that I’m aware of, but I did start receiving their paper newsletter. I’m not as wild about this–it’s really just one more piece of clutter building up in my house–but it’s something, and the information in it was actually useful. One of the first newsletters I got included their schedule of events for the next several months, as well as official membership information.

This is decent, but not great. I understand that not everyone is online, but given the particulars of this organization  I’m pretty shocked that they don’t have an email list. If they do, I wish they’d make it easier for new people to indicate they’d prefer to recieve that. But still, timely and useful.

Then we come to the third group. This is the one that really tickedme off and, sadly, lost me for good. I want to like the group, but I really am not interested after this. First of all, I get my first email from them over three months afer the event. By that point, I’d forgotten who they were and nearly sent the email to spam. Then, the entire email read like a sales pitch. I don’t mind event announcements, but I don’t enjoy having to read through all of them to get to the part where you give me the URL for your group, especially in an introductory email. I also don’t need to be reminded to join you over three times; obviously I was at some point interested so there’s no need for a hard sell. Finally, all of the recipients were listed in the ‘To’ field. This is the one that really gets me–now I have the email addresses of the other 25-30 people on the list, and they have mine. Were I a less savvy or ethical soul, I could easily spam all of those folks with my own announcements or promtions.

That email? Not useful, not friendly and it compromised my private info. Needless to say, I won’t be joining.

So if you’re reading this because you do have an organiztion that’s less wired, consider the following when emailing prospective members:

  • Be friendly. Don’t write your email like it’s a press release. Nobody reads press releases, not even the people who have to write them. If you met folks at an event, you probably chatted with them as well. Write the email like that.
  • Be timely. Everyone’s busy and you don’t need to get the email out as soon as the booth is broken down. But if you let months go on between the event and your first email, most of the people will have forgotten about you entirely.
  • Be useful. Include a link to your website. If you’ve got an event coming up soon, include that–but don’t add your entire calendar.
  • Respect privacy. I’m sure everyone you met was perfectly nice, but that doesn’t mean that I want them to have my email address. There are far too many people who reply all, forward things to every email they can get their hands on, or fall prey to viruses that blast their contacts with spam to want my email going out to random folks. Not to mention, there are plenty of people who will purposefully spam such a list if they think they can get away with it. Use BCC or an email program that lets you set up a newsletter so you don’t have to worry.

Geeks, Gamers, Girls, and Sex Appeal

So, on Friday Break Media posted a new video, Geeks and Gamer Girls. The song parodies Katy Perry’s California Gurls, and despite getting that song stuck in your head for the next seventy-two hours or so, it’s awesome. The video is by Team Unicorn, a project that includes actreses and gamers  Michele Boyd, Clare Grant, Milynn Sarley, and Rileah Vanderbilt. The video also includes appearances from Stan Lee and Katee Sackhoff (with red hair, no less, be still my beating heart) and Seth Green rapping.


Geek and Gamer Girls Song – Watch more Funny Videos

Naturally, the internet saw this and went…well, batshit. Because, of course, it’s a travesty that four beautiful women who also happen to be intelligent geeks and/or gamers would let that be seen. The things I saw thrown about generally amounted to some of the following:

* Those girls are too pretty to be gamers. They’re just actors faking it.
* They don’t represent real geek or gamers.
* There’s not enough diversity.
* It’s demeaning for women to be in a video that showcases their sex appeal.

After having had several similar discussions while working on getting the funding for the calendar, my first impulse was to roll my eyes so hard they might get stuck and then eat some ice cream and move on. It’s a debate I’m growing weary of but apparently is one that needs to be had. So let’s go.

First of all, let’s talk about the representation and diversity issues. Nobody who does a project like this claims to represent all people in a group. We’re all individuals, and it’s ridiculous to expect that any portion will represent the whole. I don’t know how this video was imagined or produced, but I know that when I start whatever crazy project I’m working on it, it usually begins with throwing ideas around with my friends, who likely wind up being involved. Which means that there are going to be a lot of similarities in the group, just based on common interests and experience. As for diversity–what does that mean? An ‘uglier’ girl? How do you phrase that request–hey, wanna be the ugly chick in our video? That’ll win you friends and influence people. Someone dressed in a frumpy costume with no makeup? Sure, but the whole point of videos like this is that they *are* produced which means you’re going to be looking a little bit better than if you just popped out to the store to pick up milk and toilet paper at 2 am. Reality show explosion aside, media isn’t reality and we shouldn’t expect it to be. There are times when it makes sense to question a lack of representation of a particular group at a systemic level (how many minority characters do you see on network TV?) but an interent video produced by a group of friends having fun is probably not the place to start. Even if those friends are in Hollywood.

So that leaves us with the trickier part. Girls who are cute, apparently don’t represent ‘real’ geeks or gamers. Or, if discussions I’ve had are any indication, knitters. Or feminists. Or intelligent, well-educated and successful women.

Wait just a minute.

Since when did belonging to any group that falls outside a mainstream stereotype of femininity mean forgoing all trappings of being female? It is not damaging or shallow to care about how you look. Yes, there’s taking it to far–but most people don’t do that.

Look. We’re human. And wanting to appear attractive to others is part of human nature. Putting on a cute outfit–or taking it off–doesn’t automatically dock your IQ points. Or your feminism. There’s not some moment at which you become so intelligent or ‘enlightened’ that you suddenly surpass caring about such things.

Caring about appearing attractive to others becomes a problem when you start to compromise your own standards to be seen that way. It becomes a problem when you take extremely unhealthy measures, or when it becomes the overriding focus in your life.

But filming a cute video? Or being in a pinup calendar? Or putting on a cute skirt and makeup? Doesn’t qualify. There’s nothing wrong with being attractive, or appearing in a way that showcases that. And it doesn’t make you any less of a geek, gamer, or feminist.